Can you please help me work throught these IRACs, including all UCC and Rest 2d. rules. Please break down all components of the contract in the response so i can see each section per party, like a true law exam. This is for practice to help me prepare for my upcoming midterm, I'm not submitting this work. This is an old exam that was provided to me to practice off of.

Harriet was a homeowner who enjoyed "do-it-yourself" (DIY) home projects. Harriet recently completed a DIY flooring project at her home. She ordered too much vinyl flooring and now has 100 square feet of flooring left over from the project.

Harriet was also employed by Home Depot, a home improvement retail store. Most of the time, Harriet worked at Home Depot as a cashier. However, when co-workers called in sick, sometimes Harriet covered for them and was assigned to work in other areas of the store, including the flooring department.

Fred was a general contractor who specialized in interior home remodels. Many of his remodel jobs included replacing the flooring in the home.

On October 1, Harriet sent the following electronically-signed email to Fred: Hi Fred.

I have 100 square feet of Type A gray vinyl plank flooring left over from a project I did at my house. I'll sell it to you for $300. I'm giving you the first crack at it. So, I'll keep the proposal open until October 31 and I won't offer or sell it to anyone else between now and then. Let me know.

On October 15, Fred found out from Harriet's best friend that Harriet sold all of the vinyl planks to someone else.

On October 16, Fred emailed Harriet the following message: Hey Harriet.

I accept your offer assuming you are willing to give me a one-year warranty on the flooring.

Harriet has come to you for legal advice. She informs you that she already sold the vinyl planks to somebody else and is concerned about any potential legal liability she may have to Fred.

Please advise Harriet as to whether she has a valid, enforceable contract with Fred.

Question #2

George wanted to replace the siding on his house. He contacted Louise, a contractor specializing in such work.

On May 1, Louise came to George's house, inspected the area where the siding needed to be replaced, and took measurements of the area. Louise then gave George a signed, written document entitled "QUOTE FOR SERVICES." The document contained all essential terms of the project, including identifying a total cost of $14,000. The document also contained the following clause:

"This document constitutes an estimate for the services and products identified herein. A follow-up appointment will be made with Homeowner to re-measure the work area and make a final determination as to the amount of product needed. At that time, Contractor will provide Homeowner with the final, agreed cost of the project."

Louise gave George a copy of the document. After reviewing the document, George responded, "This number is music to my ears. I can't wait to get started."

On May 8, one of Louise's employees came to George's house and re-measured the work area. Based on that re-measurement, the employee determined that additional product would be needed to complete the job.

On the same day, Louise called George and told George that, based on the re-measurement, the total cost of the project would be $16,000. On the same phone call, George angrily told Louise, "I thought we had a deal for $14,000! Fine! Whatever!" George then hung up the phone.

Thinking they had an agreement, Louise purchased the siding for $5,000.

On May 31, Louise showed up to George's home to start the project and realized that George's house already had new siding on it. George came out of the house and told Louise that he had another company do the project.

Louise comes to you for legal advice because she is considering suing George. Please advise her as to the following issues:

Whether Louise and George have a valid, enforceable contract and, if so, whether the contract was for $14,000 or $16,000.

Assuming Louise and George do not have a valid, enforceable contract, whether Louise can recover the cost of the siding ($5,000) from George.