can you please provide an explanation to this?

Dog bite suit eyes city's role INDIANAPOLIS - The Indiana Supreme . Court will decide wheth er southern Indiana / officials should be held liable for a dog that bit a , 6-year-old Evansville boy. The court heard oral arguments in the case Wednesday. Misty Davis sued the city of Evansville on behalf of her son, Shawn. Her suit argues that . . animal control officials knew that the Rottweller that attacked him was dangerous but failed to sanction its owner under the city's dangerous ani- mal ordinance, making the attack possible. A trial judge agreed ' with officials' argument but the state Court of Ap- peals in August voted 2-1 . to reverse that ruling.The attached article titled "Dog bite suit eyes city's role," which normally would involve the issue of either negligence, comparative or contributory, depending on the state, but since it involves a governmental entity, in this case a city, some governmental entities still have protection from liability under the old English theory "that the king could do no wrong," thus the government has no liability. What theory of law does this involve? a. intentional infliction of emotional distress b. qualified privilege C. immunity d. malpractice e. strict liability