Can you provide literature reference for the write up below. You gave it without buttressing assertions with literature referencing?

1. Nature of the study[u1]

The study methods, design, data collection, and analysis procedures in land redistribution are based on the principles of social justice. The appropriate foundational research method support for the proposed study design is qualitative research. The study will use a qualitative research design because it is well suited to examine and explore the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of those who have been involved in land redistribution in South Africa. Data will be collected through in-depth interviews and focus groups. The data will be analysed using a thematic analysis approach to get an in-depth understanding of the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of those who have been involved in land redistribution. Qualitative research designs are suited to this study because they allow for the study of a phenomenon in its natural setting. This is important in the study of land redistribution, as it allows for an understanding of the process in the context in which it is taking place. Another advantage of qualitative research designs is that they are flexible and allow for the incorporation of new data and insights as the study progresses. This is important in the study of land redistribution, as the process is ongoing, and new data and insights are likely to emerge over time. Qualitative research designs are also advantageous because they allow for the study of a phenomenon from multiple perspectives. This is important in the study of land redistribution, as it allows for a comprehensive understanding of the process from the perspective of those who are involved in it.

It is important to note however that qualitative research designs can be time-consuming and expensive, as they require a large amount of data to be collected and analysed. Generalisation of qualitative research designs is made difficult by the fact that they are typically based on small, homogeneous samples. Qualitative research designs can also be biased, as they often rely on the researcher's own interpretation of the data. This can lead to problems of validity and reliability. Qualitative research designs can be difficult to replicate, as they are often highly dependent on the specific context in which they are conducted.

Despite these disadvantages, qualitative research designs remain the best tool for exploring the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of those who have been involved in land redistribution. In-depth interviews and focus groups allow for a rich data collection, which can provide insights into the motivations, experiences, and perceptions of those who have been involved in land redistribution.

2. Significance of the study

The study on land redistribution will contribute to the field of study by providing new information on the effects of land redistribution on economic development. The study will provide insights into the impact of land redistribution on poverty alleviation, economic growth, and other development outcomes. The study will use a variety of data sources, including surveys, administrative data, and qualitative data to measure the impact of land redistribution on household income, employment, and education. The findings of the study will be useful for policy makers, academics, and researchers in designing and evaluating the impact of land redistribution on economic development.

The positive results of completing the study on land redistribution include gaining new knowledge on the effects of land redistribution and helping policy makers make informed decisions about land redistribution programmes. The significance to the study is justified by the fact that there is some evidence in the literature that suggests that land redistribution can have positive effects on economic development. For example, a study by Deininger and Feder (1996) found that land redistribution programmes in South Africa and Zimbabwe led to increases in agricultural productivity and incomes for the poorest households. However, other studies have found that land redistribution can also have negative effects on economic development, such as by reducing investment in agriculture (Kepe & Hall, 2018).

One of the main arguments in favour of land redistribution is that it can help to reduce poverty and inequality. For example, in South Africa, land redistribution was implemented as part of the country's transition from apartheid to democracy. The aim of the policy was to rectify the historic injustices of the apartheid era, when the black majority was dispossessed of their land. The policy has been successful in increasing black ownership of land, but it has also led to some negative consequences, such as a decrease in agricultural productivity (Deininger & Feder, 1996).

Policy makers, economists and sociologists may be interested in the results to make decisions on land redistribution programmes. For example, the results of the study could help policy makers to determine whether to continue with current land redistribution programmes, or whether to modify them in order to achieve better results. Economists could be interested in the results so that they could better understand the effects of land redistribution on economic development and assess whether land redistribution is an effective means of reducing poverty and promoting economic growth.

Sociologists may be interested in the results to better understand the social effects of land redistribution and to assess the impact of land redistribution on social cohesion and social stratification.

[u1]Good submissions, however most of the assertions need to be supported by literature. We need references to buttress what you are saying. That's the nature of all academic work. References are critical.