Question
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of
Capital Rationing Decision Involving Four Proposals
Kopecky Industries Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:
Investment | Year | Income from Operations | Net Cash Flows | ||||||||||
Proposal Sierra: | $910,000 | 1 | $ 80,000 | $ 250,000 | |||||||||
2 | 80,000 | 250,000 | |||||||||||
3 | 80,000 | 250,000 | |||||||||||
4 | 30,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||
5 | (70,000) | 100,000 | |||||||||||
$200,000 | $ 1,050,000 | ||||||||||||
Proposal Tango: | $1,220,000 | 1 | $320,000 | $ 560,000 | |||||||||
2 | 320,000 | 540,000 | |||||||||||
3 | 160,000 | 400,000 | |||||||||||
4 | 60,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||||
5 | (40,000) | 220,000 | |||||||||||
$820,000 | $2,020,000 | ||||||||||||
Proposal Uniform: | $500,000 | 1 | $ 90,000 | $ 200,000 | |||||||||
2 | 90,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||
3 | 90,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||
4 | 90,000 | 200,000 | |||||||||||
5 | 70,000 | 180,000 | |||||||||||
$430,000 | $ 980,000 | ||||||||||||
Proposal Victor: | $480,000 | 1 | $44,000 | $ 120,000 | |||||||||
2 | 44,000 | 120,000 | |||||||||||
3 | 44,000 | 120,000 | |||||||||||
4 | 4,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||
5 | 4,000 | 80,000 | |||||||||||
$140,000 | $ 520,000 |
The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.
Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest | |||||
Year | 6% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 20% |
1 | 0.943 | 0.909 | 0.893 | 0.870 | 0.833 |
2 | 0.890 | 0.826 | 0.797 | 0.756 | 0.694 |
3 | 0.840 | 0.751 | 0.712 | 0.658 | 0.579 |
4 | 0.792 | 0.683 | 0.636 | 0.572 | 0.482 |
5 | 0.747 | 0.621 | 0.567 | 0.497 | 0.402 |
6 | 0.705 | 0.564 | 0.507 | 0.432 | 0.335 |
7 | 0.665 | 0.513 | 0.452 | 0.376 | 0.279 |
8 | 0.627 | 0.467 | 0.404 | 0.327 | 0.233 |
9 | 0.592 | 0.424 | 0.361 | 0.284 | 0.194 |
10 | 0.558 | 0.386 | 0.322 | 0.247 | 0.162 |
Instructions:
1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals. Assume that net cash flows are uniform throughout the year.
Cash Payback Period | |
Proposal Sierra | Select 4 years, 3 years, 3 years 6 months, 2 years, 3 years 9 months, 3 years 10 months. |
Proposal Tango | Select 2 years, 2 years 3 months, 3 years, 3 years 3 months, 4 years, 2 years 4 months. |
Proposal Uniform | Select 3 years, 3 years 3 months, 2 years 9 months, 3 years 6 months, 4 years, 2 years 6 months. |
Proposal Victor | Select 3 years, 3 years 3 months, 4 years 6 months, 3 years 6 months, 3 years 8 months, 3 years 10 months. |
2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. Round to two decimal places.
Average Rate of Return | |
Proposal Sierra | -------% |
Proposal Tango | -------% |
Proposal Uniform | ------- % |
Proposal Victor | ------- % |
3. Using the results from parts (1) and (2) determine which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected.
Accept / Reject | |
Proposal Sierra | Select AcceptReject |
Proposal Tango | Select AcceptReject |
Proposal Uniform | Select AcceptReject |
Proposal Victor | Select AcceptReject |
4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value of $1 table above. If required, use the minus sign to indicate a negative net present value.
Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. | Select Proposal SierraProposal Tango | Select Proposal UniformProposal Victor |
Present value of net cash flow total | $ | $ |
Amount to be invested | ||
Net present value | $ | $ |
5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). Round to two decimal places.
Select the proposal to compute present value index. | Select Proposal Sierra Proposal Tango | Select Proposal Uniform Proposal Victor |
Present value index (rounded) |
6. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present values of net cash flows computed in part (4).
Rank 1st | Select Proposal SierraProposal TangoProposal UniformProposal Victor. |
Rank 2nd | Select Proposal SierraProposal TangoProposal UniformProposal Victor. |
7. Rank the proposals from most attractive to least attractive, based on the present value indexes computed in part (5).
Rank 1st | Select Proposal Sierra, Proposal Tango, Proposal Uniform, Proposal Victor.
|
Rank 2nd | Select Proposal Sierra, Proposal Tango, Proposal Uniform, Proposal Victor. |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started