CASE 1: John sold a pair of skis to Bob, making no specific warranties or promises of any kind other than letting Bob examine and try them. In fact, John did not own the skis; he had only rented them. When the true owner claimed them, Bob demanded his money back. John defended his actions by stating that he had made no warranty of any kind. a) Did John give an implied warranty of title? Assess. (10 marks) b) Evaluate the express warranty.(15 marks) CASE 2: In 1967 the plaintiffs, Ashmore, Benson, Pease & Co, manufactured tube tanks. The defendants, AV Dawson, a haulage company, agreed to carry the plaintiff's equipment by lorry. With the knowledge of the plaintiff's transport manager, the defendants loaded their vehicle in excess of the weight permitted by the Road Traffic Act 1960, s.64(2). The vehicle toppled over during the journey, and the plaintiffs sued in negligence for 2,225 in damage caused to the equipment by the defendant's driving. At first instance the trial judge found in favour of the plaintiffs and awarded damages. The defendants appealed. a) Analyze in details the type of contract that took place between the two parties? (10 marks) b) Evaluate whether any recovery of damage can take place if a party enters into a lawful contract but the contract is carried out unlawfully. (15 marks) CASE 3: Employed F to clean a roof which was made of corrugated sheets. F did not take any safety precautions when cleaning. The premises were contaminated with asbestos and needed extensive work to repair the damage. B brought an action in damages for the cost of the repair work on the basis of F breaching contractual terms. F argued that B had contributed to the negligence as B had not supervised F during the cleaning. B counter-argued that their claim was brought under contract law. a) Analyze in details the type of breach of duty has taken place? (10 marks) b) Categorize different faults committed by the plaintiff.( 15 marks)