Case #2: Power Play at The Inn [60 points] This case relates to unique issues associated with a family enterprise. Write a minimum of 200 words for each question. Pay attention to the Case Grading Rubric. Upload the assignment as a Microsoft Word file to Moodle when completed. Read the Case \"Power Play at The Inn\" and answer the following questions. The case is located on page 77 of the textbook. When answering the questions, FOLLOW THE FORMAT PROVIDED BELOW. Delete all Notes in parentheses prior to submission; they are simply there to explain the formatting structure. Case Policy: Your Professor is aware that information regarding this case can be found via the Internet. However, this assignment should reflect your learning experience in MADM 752. Therefore, you should use course material (textbook concepts/video information) and external sources to craft your responses. All external sources must be cited using APA format and should be not be \"lifted\" from other places. DO NOT COPY INFORMATION FROM THE TEXTBOOK!! Question 1: What specific actions should Robert take regarding Jake's power play? Provide support via course material and external sources. (Note: You may have more than three actions.) Robert Action #1 (Put the name of the first action Robert should take here) Put your reasoning for Action #1 with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Robert Action #2 (Put the name of the second action Robert should take here) Put your reasoning for Action #2 with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Robert Action #3 (Put the name of the third action Robert should take here) Put your reasoning for Action #3 with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Question #2: List the potential pros and cons of Jake becoming the General Manager after this incident. Provide support via course material and external sources. (Note: You may have more than two for each.) Pro #1 (Put the name of the first pro here) Put your reasoning for pro with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Pro #2 (Put the name of the second pro here) Put your reasoning for pro with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Con #1 (Put the name of the first con here) Put your reasoning for con with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support Con #2 (Put the name of the second con here) Put your reasoning for con with justification/support here Use more bullets if you have additional justification/support \fCase Grading Rubric Grade: The minimum possible score for this rubric is 0 points and it will be converted to the minimum grade available in this module. The maximum score 60 points will be converted to the maximum grade. Excellent Satisfactory A minimum of 200 words per question. (e.g. Question 1 > 200 words, Question 2 > 200 words) and format is followed consistently Basic Basic: Word count is less than 200 words per question and format is not followed consistently 8 8 5 Excellent: Discussion or assignment response is fully developed, substantive and accurate Satisfactory: Discussion or assignment response is mostly developed, partially substantive and mostly accurate Basic: Discussion lacks substance and reflects limited understanding of concepts. Content has major inaccuracies 11 Excellent: Discussion or assignment response displays depth of analysis, provides significant insight not otherwise offered and relates to assigned topic 8 Satisfactory: Discussion or assignment response displays some depth of analysis and insight and is partially relevant to assigned topic 4 Basic: Discussion or assignment response suffers from limited analysis and is mostly irrelevant to the topic 11 8 4 Excellent: Uses course specific evidence as well as examples to support ideas. Discusses reasoned implications and conclusions. Incorporates three or more external sources related to the topic. Uses APA format and style for citing external sources Satisfactory: Uses course specific evidence and provides examples, but evidence and examples may not be appropriate to idea. Discussion of reasoned implications and conclusions is limited. Incorporates at least two external sources related to topic. Uses APA format and style for citing external sources Basic: Limited use of course specific evidence and/or examples. Evidence and examples are mostly irrelevant and do not support the ideas being developed. No discussion of implications or conclusions. Incorporates at least one external source related to topic. Incorrect or inconsistent APA format and style for citing external sources 18 14 7 Excellent: Language is clear, concise and easy to understand. Uses vocabulary appropriately and is organized. Content has few/no grammatical or spelling errors Satisfactory: Is adequately written, but may need clarification. Content has some grammatical or spelling errors Basic: Is poorly written; terms are used incorrectly; ideas are obscure. Content filled with grammatical and mechanical errors Late Assignment Nothing to assess 0 Nothing to assess 0 Nothing to assess 0 Does not provide evidence, examples or external citations with APA format and style 0 Nothing to assess 12 9 4 0 60 47 24 0 Adapted from Mabry, Knighten, Williams, Morris, Knotts