Case #3 Canada Adventures is a travel company conducting week long bus trips across Canada Canada Adventures and the Sure Stay Hotel Group entered into an agreement in which Canada Adventures clients would stay exclusively in Sure Stay Hotels on their tripas in exchange for a flat rate for the summer season. Sure Stay assured Canada Adventures that it had large hotels in Kamloops, Revelstoke, Banff, and Jasper and that the hotels would accommodate all Canada Adventures clients over the course of the summer. Canada Adventures paid the fee for the summer at the start of the season, but did not speally the number of clients it had booked and who would need accommodation, On Canada Adventures' first trip of the summer, they attempted to check their clients into the Sure Stay Hotel in Rebelstoke. They were told that the hotel was not big enough to accommodate all twenty of Canada Adventures clients, as it had only fifteen rooms, Canada Adventures had to lodge a large number of its clients at different hotels in Revelstoke at a Significant expense. Canada Adventures seeks to recover the cost of the additional hotel rooms, 1. What is the legal issue(s)? 2 marks) 2. What is the legal test (rule of law) used by the courts? (1 mark) 3. Develop a logical argument for the plaintiff, applying the rule of law to the facts? (1 mark) 4. Develop a logical argument for the defendants, applying the rule of law to the facts (1 mark) Case #3 Canada Adventures is a travel company conducting week long bus trips across Canada Canada Adventures and the Sure Stay Hotel Group entered into an agreement in which Canada Adventures clients would stay exclusively in Sure Stay Hotels on their tripas in exchange for a flat rate for the summer season. Sure Stay assured Canada Adventures that it had large hotels in Kamloops, Revelstoke, Banff, and Jasper and that the hotels would accommodate all Canada Adventures clients over the course of the summer. Canada Adventures paid the fee for the summer at the start of the season, but did not speally the number of clients it had booked and who would need accommodation, On Canada Adventures' first trip of the summer, they attempted to check their clients into the Sure Stay Hotel in Rebelstoke. They were told that the hotel was not big enough to accommodate all twenty of Canada Adventures clients, as it had only fifteen rooms, Canada Adventures had to lodge a large number of its clients at different hotels in Revelstoke at a Significant expense. Canada Adventures seeks to recover the cost of the additional hotel rooms, 1. What is the legal issue(s)? 2 marks) 2. What is the legal test (rule of law) used by the courts? (1 mark) 3. Develop a logical argument for the plaintiff, applying the rule of law to the facts? (1 mark) 4. Develop a logical argument for the defendants, applying the rule of law to the facts (1 mark)