Case: Macy v. Holder Appeal No. 0120120821 Agency No. ATF-2011-00751 April 20, 2012

I need help identifyingthe following:

1.Facts

2.Issue

3.Applicable Laws

4.Holding

5.Reasoning

6.This was a very important decision by EEOOC because it changed its previous position. Do you understand the agency's analysis of why it held as it did in the decision?

7.Do you understand why the prospective employer may have been concerned and made the decision it did? Explain.

8.Given the evolution of the law as set forth by EEOC, do you agree with EEOC's conclusion?