CASE: Marissa was interested in buying a used personal watercraft from Victor. She informed him she was looking for a watercraft in good shape, one that had not had any major issues, especially with the engine. He told her that the watercraft was in great shape and that he was not aware of any issues or problems with the engine. Marissa agreed to pay Victor $4,000 for the watercraft. Marissa was going out of town, so they agreed that when she returned in a week, she would sign the contract, pay Victor, and pick up the watercraft. During that week, the manufacturer notified Victor that the watercraft was being recalled because it had a faulty engine. Victor said nothing about the engine recall when Marissa came to pick up the watercraft. They signed the contract, and she paid the $4,000 and left with the watercraft. Later, Marissa started having problems with the watercraft engine and found out that Victor had been notified of engine recall before they signed the contract. She asked for a refund, accusing Victor of fraud. Victor refused on the basis that he did not make any misrepresentation. PRIMARY POST: 1) List the elements required to prove fraudulent misrepresentation. 2) Is Marissa entitled to a refund? Explain