CASE QUESTIONS 1. Why should actual cause be a jury question rather than a question that the trial judge decides on her own? 2. Could this case have fit one of the standard exceptions to the common-law rule that injuries on the premises are the responsibility of the tenant? 3. Does it mean anything at all to say, as the court does, that persons (including landlords) must "exercise reasonable care not to subject others to an unreasonable risk of harm?" Is this a rule that gives very much direction to landlords who may wonder what the limit of their liabilities might be?