case study 1;

Increasing the strength of a radio wave will not help it knock off electrons. Increasing the strength of a radio wave simply introduces more photons into the beam. But each radio photon still has the same energy it always does, which is not enough to ionize. When non-ionizing waves flow past a molecule, they shake up the electrons a bit but don't knock them off. This electron shaking leads to heating. A microwave oven heats up your food in the same way a campfire heats up your skin and in the same way a radio wave ever-so-slightly heats up your body. None of them causes cancer, no matter how long you sit there. You may get burned by sticking your hand in the fire or grabbing a hot dish right out of the microwave, but you won't get a tumor.

A candle flame emits a thousand to a million times more energy per photon than a cell phone. Public Domain Image, source: Christopher S. Baird.

case study 2;

If a radio wave did cause cancer, then candlelight would cause far more cancer, because visible light has far more energy per photon. In terms of radiation, a candle emits far more energy than a cell phone, and they are both harmless. Infrared waves have more energy per photon than radio waves, and everything with a non-zero temperature emits infrared waves. This means that the infrared waves coming from your chair, your pencil, and your clothes would give you cancer long before radio waves from your cell phone would, but they don't. The world is swamped with natural radio waves and infrared waves. Just ask any infrared camera designer what his main obstacle is in designing a camera and he will tell you his greatest challenge is separating the meaningful waves from all the background waves in the air. Anybody who has struggled with an old-fashioned analog TV antenna in an attempt to get a clear picture can tell you that the natural radio waves in the air can be quite overwhelming compared to the man-made ones.

1.from the focal point of view of theDigressive tax, demonstrate the two justifications that support it to be relevant in the finance goals

2. Illustrate on the less inflationary advantage of the Direct Taxes in conserving finances

3. as a drawback to the direct tax; what is your understanding of the lack announcement effect and its imnpacyt on finance

4.for the second aspect of the tax burden in finance, explain the nature of the operations of the indirect burden

5.for the subsequent of the above question, describe the aspect of the money tax burden for the finance dynamics

6.how does the importance of the tax incidence effect on the positivity of the numerous objectives in finance

7.i need a well detailed explanation of theeffect in economic welfare induced by the Absolute taxable capacity in financing

8.from the above question, explain the other half of the opposite nature and how it influence the same in finance

9.how is the purpose of taxation a factor influencing the general view of the finance taxation?

10.introduce the budgetary objectives in the fiscal year for the government financing