Case study 2.1 - Pelham v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia 1. Explain
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Case study 2.1 - Pelham v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia
1. Explain the doctrine of respondeat superior and how did it apply as alleged by Pelham?
2. How did the elements of negligence apply to the coaching staff in this case?
3. Coaches are held to a standard of care in which they should not increase exposure to harm. How did this concept apply in this case?
4. Under what circumstances would this case be considered gross negligence, ordinary negligence, comparative negligence, contributory negligence, or mixed contributory and comparative negligence?
Related Book For
Dynamic Business Law
ISBN: 9781260733976
6th Edition
Authors: Nancy Kubasek, M. Neil Browne, Daniel Herron, Lucien Dhooge, Linda Barkacs
Posted Date: