CASE STUDY ON SPECIAL STEEL COMPANY LIMITED Special steel company limited (SSCL) is a reputed company and specializes in alloy steel manufacturing in Nagpur. The company turnover is 650 crores in last fiscal and has quality reputation in the market. Since it entered market in mid-70's. It exported in last year value 69 crore. Growth rate of the company is 11% and SSCL is looking forward for brown field expansion of its capacities. SSCL markets its products at competitive prices in all industrial towns in India. The exports are handled from its head office in Nagpur and export division in Mumbai. The domestic marketing is divided in 4 Zones North with its office in Delhi, South Zonal Office in Chennai. Similarly Eastern Zonal Office, Kolkata. Mumbai is Western Zonal Office and also in addition handled experts and imports activities. The company by practice has established good ethical standards. The standards were by the chairman of the SSCL Aravind Jain. The company executives were known for their integrity and hard work and thus taking the company to growth path. Chairman of SSCL was assisted by Board of Directors and Company Secretary. The functional and full time directors were in the area of Finance, Production, Marketing, HRD and Project. Director marketing and Director Project used to go on tours frequently to Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, and Mumbai and to overseas on their work. The tour frequencies were almost weekly. Regular coordination and follow up of activities were done in department and Zonal meetings. Aravind Jain was following news item on Star News. He was shocked to see news flash that the Marketing Director K. Ram of SSCL was alleged for molestation of a lady employee serving in his office in Mumbai. The Mumbai police were looking for Ram for arresting and further action. Ram was in Delhi on Saturday. Jain telephoned immediately Zonal Manager in SSCL Mumbai and Delhi, so that he can get first-hand information. He was angry that he should get his company information through TV news. The Zonal Manager Delhi informed that he was not aware of any Mumbai incident. The Zonal Manager Mumbai was not available in his house in Mulund (a suburb of Mumbai). Even after 2 days there was no news or whereabouts of the Mumbai Zonal Manager. TV news on 3rd Day gave that Mumbai police were searching the absconding K. Ram, Marketing Director of SSCL. Newspapers and weekly business magazines published and news articles on the subject. A business weekly gave a story with photographs of K. Ram and the lady employee giving their side of the story. Ram aged 54, is a marketing whiz-kid and considered good in exports and international negotiations. Son of Ram was in UK as a software engineer. Ram's story gave that the lady employee, a secretary in Mumbai office, did come to his five star hotel room and went away. The TV story was made up by Competitor Company to tarnish SSCL image. The lady employee contended that she was called by Ram along with Zonal Manager for official work to the hotel. In the hotel room Ram molested her telling that she will be promoted as officer shortly. The lady ran and lodged FIR in police station. The lady was middle aged and has a son going to high school. The next week TV news said "Ram, Director of SSCL surrenders to Mumbai police. Police took him to custody and produced in Magistrate Court. The court granted bail to Ram". Questions: A. Discuss the ethical issues of the company involved in this case. ( 7 Marks) B. What are reactions on the issue from different stake holders of SSCL? ( 7 Marks) C. What Policy decisions can be taken to stop such recurrences ( 6 Marks)