Question
CASE STUDY Thomas is a junior auditor on the audit team for James Ltd (James). The same audit firm has been James auditor for the
CASE STUDY Thomas is a junior auditor on the audit team for James Ltd (James). The same audit firm has been James auditor for the past two years. During this time, the auditors have completed both the financial audit and the compliance audit for the Department of Treasury and Finance, stating that the business has adhered to the Corporations Act 2001. James has requested that the auditors undertake both audit engagements again for the current year. In each of the previous two years, the audit team has tested all of James internal controls relevant to ensuring compliance with the Regulations. There have been no exceptions detected in this testing of controls in the past two years. A combined approach is also planned for the current year.
Thomas suggests that, since there were no exceptions detected in previous years, no work on internal controls is required because last years evidence will be sufficient.
Required
Explain why Thomas suggestion is not appropriate.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started