CASE: Terry V. Ohio

I truly appreciate your help.

2ind half of outline

OUTLINE

1. Infringement of Constitutional Protection Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures 2. Absence of Sufficient Grounds for Legal Action 3. Illegal Search and Seizure

Section V. Court Proceedings

The decision made by the District Court. Appellate Court Decision Supreme Court ruling

VI. Decision of the Supreme Court

Opinion of the majority written by Chief Justice Warren 1. The term "Stop and Frisk" refers to the practice of temporarily detaining and searching individuals by law enforcement officers. 2. The "Reasonable Suspicion Standard" is a legal requirement that the officer must have a justifiable belief, based on specific facts, that a person is engaged in criminal activity in order to stop and frisk them. 3. Striking a Balance Between Individual Rights and Law Enforcement Interests

B. Contrary Opinion(s)

7. Influence and Heritage

The establishment of a legal precedent by the Terry v. Ohio case. Impact on Police Procedures C. Follow-up Legal Disputes and Explanations

8. Conclusion