Cassandra operates several locations of a major franchise in her city. On year, in advance of the holiday season, she contracts with a maker of gift cards, Gift Genius, to create $1,000$ gift cards of various denominations with both her local logo and the franchise logo on the gift card. Gift Genius delivers two weeks after the agreed upon delivery date, and Cassandra $($being a bit frazzled about the now impending holiday season$)$ accepts delivery and pays via check. The next day, she looks through the gift cards delivered and notes that a very sloppy job was done in putting the logos on the cards and that they don$$t look exactly like the design that she ordered. She puts a stop payment on the check but doesn$$t tell Gift Genius why she has cancelled her payment for the gift cards. Later on$,$ when Gift Genius found out the check has been cancelled, it sues Cassandra attempting to force her to pay for the gift cards after all. Cassandra$$s jurisdiction mirrors the New York City Civil Court. Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding this situation?