Cate is an employee of an armored truck service that delivers money and valuables. A bank hires the service company to deliver bags of money that belong to the bank to various branches throughout the city. Cate is the employee who is assigned to drive the truck that contains the money bags belonging to the bank. Soon after she starts driving to the first branch, she parks the truck, goes to the back door, gets the money bags, opens them, and removes the money. She takes the money home. Cate is charged with larceny and convicted. On appeal, Cates lawyer argues that her conviction should be reversed because there is insufficient evidence of the elements of larceny. Which of the following reasons will the appellate court give for the decision it makes in Cates case? I. The fact that Cate was given only temporary custody of the money means that the conviction should be reversed. II. The fact that Cate qualifies as a bailee means that the conviction should be affirmed. III. The fact that Cate had instructions for delivery of the money means that the conviction should be affirmed. IV.The fact that Cate took the money while it was in the custody of the service company means that the conviction should be reversed.

A. II B. II, III C. I D. I, IV