Question
Cato Company has been allocating overhead to individual product lines based on each lines relative share of direct labor hours. For the upcoming year, the
Cato Company has been allocating overhead to individual product lines based on each lines relative share of direct labor hours. For the upcoming year, the company estimated that manufacturing overhead will be $3,780,000 and estimated direct labor hours will be 252,000. The company also has the following estimates:
Cost Pool | Cost Driver | Total Amount | Total Amount of Activity | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maintenance costs | Direct labor hours | $ 1,470,000 | 252,000 | ||||||
Setup costs | Number of setups | 1,050,000 | 200 | ||||||
Engineering costs | Number of design changes | 1,260,000 | 400 | ||||||
$3,780,000 |
Among many other products, Cato has two switches, Standard and Elite switches. Standard switches are a high-volume product that the company makes in large batches, while Elite switches are a specialty product that is fairly low in sales volume. Information about Standard and Elite usage of the different activities follows:
Standard | Elite | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct labor hours | 3,000 | 300 | ||||
Number of setups | 1 | 14 | ||||
Number of design changes | 2 | 20 |
Calculate the predetermined overhead rate based on direct labor hours (traditional allocation). (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25.)
Predetermined overhead rate | $enter a dollar amount | per DLH |
Use this predetermined overhead rate to calculate the amount of overhead to apply to Standard and Elite switches, based on their usage of direct labor hours. (Round answers to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125.)
Standard | Elite | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overhead allocated | $enter a dollar amount for Overhead allocated to standard rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for Overhead allocated to elite rounded to 0 decimal places |
eTextbook and Media
Calculate the individual ABC pool rates by taking the total amount of overhead for each cost pool and dividing that total by the total amount of activity for that pool. (Round maintenance costs pool rate to 2 decimal places, e.g. 15.25 and other answers to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125.)
Cost Pool | Cost pool rate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Maintenance costs | $enter a dollar amount rounded to 2 decimal places | /DLH | ||
Setup costs | $enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places | /setup | ||
Engineering costs | $enter a dollar amount rounded to 0 decimal places | /design change | ||
Allocate overhead to each of the two products using these three activity rates. (Round answers to 0 decimal places, e.g. 125.)
Maintenance Costs | Setup Costs | Engineering | Total MOH | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard | $enter a dollar amount for Standard maintenance costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for Standard set up costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for standard Engineering costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for standard Total MOH rounded to 0 decimal places | |||||
Elite | $enter a dollar amount for elite maintenance costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for elite set up costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for elite Engineering costs rounded to 0 decimal places | $enter a dollar amount for elite Total MOH rounded to 0 decimal places |
Compare the overhead calculated in part a to that calculated in part b. Which allocation method (traditional or ABC) most likely results in a better estimate of product cost? select an option Traditional methodABC method
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started