Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Week 4: Research Literature, Design and Sampling PURPOSE: This assignment provides the opportunity for

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Week 4: Research Literature, Design and Sampling PURPOSE: This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue development of a MSN EBP scholarly project that started with the identification of a nursing issue and PICOT/PICo question. The focus of this assignment is to discuss the research literature support, identify an appropriate research design approach and sampling method. Students are to attach this completed assignment to their previous assignment from Week 2 by removing the conclusion from the first assignment and add the new information to the same document; using the headings indicated below. Students are to have revised the previous assignment from Week 2 based on faculty feedback for this presentation. COURSE OUTCOME: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcome: CO #4 Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies (PO 1, 2, 6, 9) DUE DATE Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Four TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 145 POINTS REQUIREMENTS Description of the Assignment: This continues the development of a MSN EBP scholarly project by requiring the student to identify the additional elements of the process. The required elements are noted to be: Assignment Revision: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research (Week Two Assignment) Research Literature Support Research Approach/design Sampling Criteria for Content 1. Assignment Revision: The student is to include at the beginning of this assignment the revisions made within the assignment for Week Two. Remove the conclusion from Week Two's assignment but save it for future use. W4 Assignment Research Lit Design Sampling Rev. 07/27/2017 (AR) 1 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice 2. Research Literature Support: Using the references cited in the Research Critique Table from Week Three Assignment, students discuss the applicable elements of each research study article that directly supports the PICOT/PICo question. An additional ten (10) references must be included for this section in order to provide a useful review of the literature related to the identified PICOT/PICo question or proposed solution. This section of the proposal is to be presented as Research Literature Support. 3. Research Approach/Design: In this section, the student will identify the research approach and design to be used in order to obtain the data for answering the PICOT/PICo question. For this assignment, the research approach is identified to be either quantitative or qualitative. The research design is the sub-categories of each research approach. For example, the quantitative approach has the design categories of experimental, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental. The qualitative approach has the design categories of phenomenology, grounded theory, epidemiological, and historical. Required content includes: Identification of the research approach as quantitative or qualitative or mixed methods Identification of research design (i.e. quasi-experimental, phenomenology, etc.) Description of the selected design (i.e. quasi-experimental, phenomenology, etc.) Rationale for the selected design (i.e. quasi-experimental, phenomenology, etc.) Identifies one advantage of the selected design (i.e. quasi-experimental, phenomenology, etc.) Identifies one disadvantage of the selected design (i.e. quasi-experimental, phenomenology, etc.) 4. Sampling method: In this section, the student will identify the sampling method to be used in order to obtain the necessary participants. Discussion of participants' rights is also included. Required content includes: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify two advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify one disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Explain how participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) PREPARING THE ASSIGNMENT Criteria for Format and Special Instructions 1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should not exceed 6 (six) pages for this section of the project proposal. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements. This page limit excludes the information from Week Two's assignment that is copied and pasted into this assignment. 2. Title page, running head, body of paper, headings, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. 3. Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see \"What is a scholarly source\" located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com W4 Assignment Research Lit Design Sampling Rev. 07/27/2017 (AR) 2 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. 4. Students are to attach this assignment to their revised assignment from Week Two. Remove the conclusion from Week Two's assignment but save it for future use. DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA Assignment Criteria Points % Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper revisions (end of Week Two assignment) 30 21 The required content is: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper (end of Week Two assignment) is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Literature, Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment (end of Week 4 assignment) has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into Research (Week Two's Assignment) but before the reference list Research Literature Support 20 14 The required content is: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the Research Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo question or proposed solution Research Approach 30 21 The required content is: Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, W4 Assignment Description Research Lit Design Sampling Rev. 07/27/2017 (AR) 3 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to selected design Describe ONE disadvantage to selected design Sampling 30 21 The required content is: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Explain how participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) Conclusion 10 7 The required content is: Paper Specifications 5 3 Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content Paper does not exceed 6 pages Minimum of 2 (two) scholarly nursing references related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them. APA Format (6th edition) 10 7 Title page, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. One deduction for each type of APA style error Citations in Text W4 Assignment 5 3 Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly. Research Lit Design Sampling Rev. 07/27/2017 (AR) 4 Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Writing Mechanics Total W4 Assignment 5 145 3 Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual. 100 % Research Lit Design Sampling Rev. 07/27/2017 (AR) 5 Chamberlain College of Nursing GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Exceptional 100% Outstanding or highest level of performance NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Exceeds 88% Very good or high level of performance Meets 80% Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement 38% Poor or failing level of performance Developing 0% Unsatisfactory level of performance 26 Points Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into 24 Points Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into Research (Week Two's Assignment) 11 Points Presentation of information in two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into Research (Week Two's Assignment) 0 Points Presentation of information unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into Research (Week Two's Assignment) Content Possible Points = 125 Points Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper revisions 30 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment paper is revised based on faculty feedback All corrections for each section of the paper have been completed Week 2 assignment paper conclusion has been removed Research Design Approach and Sampling Assignment has been added to the bottom of the Refinement of Nursing Issue into Chamberlain College of Nursing Research (Week Two's Assignment) but before the reference list Research Literature Support 20 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the Research NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Research (Week Two's Assignment) but before the reference list 18 Points Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the but before the reference list 16 Points Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the Research Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo but before the reference list 8 Points Presentation of information in ONE of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the Research Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo but before the reference list 0 Points Presentation of information unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: Discuss each research article presented in the Research Critique Table (Week Three assignment); one paragraph for each article Include the following information presented within each research article: purpose, research approach/design, data collection methods, results, strengths and limitation of the study. Additional ten (10) references have been added to the references from the Research Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo Chamberlain College of Nursing Research Approach and Design NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo question or proposed solution 30 Points Research Critique Table to support selected PICOT/PICo question or proposed solution 26 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasiexperimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological , ethnography, grounded theory, historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to selected design Describe ONE question or proposed solution question or proposed solution question or proposed solution 24 Points 11 Points 0 Points Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to selected design Describe ONE disadvantage to selected design Presentation of information in one, two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Presentation of information unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to selected design Describe ONE disadvantage to selected design Identify if the project is to use a quantitative or qualitative approach If it is quantitative: identify if the design is experimental, quasi-experimental or descriptive If it is qualitative: identify if the design is phenomenological, ethnography, grounded theory, historical Describe the selected design Provide a rationale for selected design Describe ONE advantage to selected design Describe ONE disadvantage to Chamberlain College of Nursing selected design Describe ONE disadvantage to selected design 30 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Sample NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice disadvantage to selected design 26 Points Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure selected design 24 Points Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Explain how 11 Points Presentation of information in two or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Explain how 0 Points Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements: Describe the target population Identify if the project is to use probability or nonprobability sampling Provide a complete description of the sampling procedure including sample size Identify TWO advantages to the selected sampling procedure Identify ONE disadvantage to the selected sampling procedure Explain how Chamberlain College of Nursing Explain how participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) 10 Points Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content Conclusion Paper Specification s 5 Points This section included all of the following: Paper meet length requirements of 6 (six) pages or less Minimum of 2 (two) additional scholarly nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice Explain how participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) 9 Points Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content 4 Points This section included three of the following: Paper meet length requirements of 5 pages or less Minimum of 2 (two) additional scholarly nursing references participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) 8 Points Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content 3 Points This section included only two of the following: Paper meet length requirements of 5 pages or less Minimum of 2 (two) additional scholarly participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) 4 Points Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content 2 Points This section included only one of the following: Paper meet length requirements of 5 pages or less Minimum of 2 (two) additional scholarly participant's rights will be protected (i.e. confidentiality, anonymity, protection from harm) 0 Points Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides a summary of key elements from paper Identifies expected outcomes for the project proposal based on assignment content 0 Points This section included none of the following: Paper meet length requirements of 5 pages or less Minimum of 2 (two) additional scholarly nursing references Chamberlain College of Nursing references related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. nursing references related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. nursing references related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. related to this content A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references. References are current - within a 5year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them. Total Content Points __________out of 125 Format Possible Points = 20 Points APA Style 10 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page 9 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page 8 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page 4 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page 0 Points APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the title page, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page Chamberlain College of Nursing Citations Writing Mechanics One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present 5 Points There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty. 5 Points 1-2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 - 3 APA errors were present One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 - 5 APA were are present One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 - 7 APA were are present One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present 4 Points There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 3 Points There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2 Points There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 0 Points There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 3 Points 5 - 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 2 Points 7 - 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual 0 Points 9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty. 4 Points 3 - 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual Total Points _____of 145 points

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

College Algebra Graphs and Models

Authors: Marvin L. Bittinger, Judith A. Beecher, David J. Ellenbogen, Judith A. Penna

5th edition

321845404, 978-0321791009, 321791002, 978-0321783950, 321783956, 978-0321845405

More Books

Students also viewed these Mathematics questions