Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Chapter 12 CASE PROBLEM Kirk v. Dickson, Mr. Dickson owned a 20-acre ranch with a house on it in Stanislaus County. He agreed to sell

Chapter 12 CASE PROBLEM

Kirk v. Dickson,

Mr. Dickson owned a 20-acre ranch with a house on it in Stanislaus County. He agreed to sell it to Mr. Kirk for $114,000. For income tax reasons, Dickson didnt want to collect the full price at the time of the sale, so Kirk executed an $80,940 promissory note and a trust deed in favor of Dickson. Kirk was to pay $8,709 (principal and 8.75% annual interest) each year for 20 years. The note provided that if Kirk paid anything extra during the first five years of the loan, Dickson would charge a 50% penalty on the extra amounts.

Seven months after buying the property, Kirk decided to build a new house there. He couldnt obtain financing for the project unless he paid off Dicksons trust deed. But if Kirk did that, Dickson would charge the 50% prepayment penalty on more than $70,000so the penalty alone would come to more than $35,000.

Kirk sued for a declaratory judgment, asking the court to rule that the prepayment penalty was invalid. Could Dickson enforce the penalty provision? Does it make any difference whether the court treated the ranch as residential property? Could Dickson have included a lock-in clause in the loan agreement?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Mergers Acquisition And Other Restructuring Activities

Authors: Donald M. Depamphilis

6th Edition

123854857, 978-0123854858

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions