Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Chapter 13 1. Lester purchased a used automobile from MacKintosh Motors. He asked the seller if the car had ever been in a wreck. The

Chapter 13

1. Lester purchased a used automobile from MacKintosh Motors. He asked the seller if the car had ever been in a wreck. The MacKintosh salesperson had never seen the car before that morning and knew nothing of its history but quickly answered Lester's question by stating: "No. It has never been in a wreck." In fact, the auto had been seriously damaged in a wreck and, although repaired, was worth much less than the value it would have had if there had been no wreck. When Lester learned the truth, he sued MacKintosh Motors and the salesperson for damages for fraud. They raised the defense that the salesperson did not know the statement was false and had not intended to deceive Lester. Did the conduct of the salesperson constitute fraud?

Chapter 14 Question

1. Sarah's house caught on fire. The fire was quickly extinguished through her neighbor Odessa's prompt assistance. In gratitude, Sarah promised to pay Odessa $1,000. Can Odessa enforce this promise?

2. William E. Story agreed to pay his nephew, William E. Story II, a large sum of money (roughly equivalent to $75,000 in 2016 dollars) "if he would refrain from drinking liquor, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he should come to be 21 years of age." William II had been using tobacco and occasionally drank liquor but refrained from using these stimulants over several years until he was 21 and also lived up to the other requirements of his uncle's offer. Just after William II's 21st birthday, Story acknowledged that William II had fulfilled his part of the bargain and advised that the money would be invested for him with interest. The story died, and his executor, Sidway, refused to pay William II because he believed the contract between Story and William II was without consideration. Sidway asserted that Story received no benefit from William II's performance and William II suffered no detriment (in fact, by refraining from using liquor and tobacco, William II was not harmed but benefited, Sidway asserted). Is there any theory of consideration that William II can rely on? How would you decide this case? [Hamer v. Sidway, 124 N.Y. 538]

Book information;

Anderson's Business Law & The Legal Environment - Comprehensive Edition, 24th Edition

ISBN: 9780357363850

By: David P. Twomey; Marianne M.

Chapters 13-14, please write what pages you get your answers, please

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Problems In Contract Law Cases And Materials

Authors: Charles L. Knapp, Nathan M. Crystal, Harry G. Prince

9th Edition

1543801471, 978-1543801477

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

Pollution

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

The fear of making a fool of oneself

Answered: 1 week ago