Chapter 6of your text discussesMapp v. Ohio.In this case,the U.S. Supreme Court; dismissing claims relating to the First Amendment,declared that "all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by [the Fourth Amendment], inadmissible in a state court."Go to the following link to listen to the 1961 oral arguments in the case:https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960/236

(Links to an external site.)

Links to an external site.

After listening to the attorney's arguments in the case, consider the following questions:

• What aspects of the attorneys' arguments stood out for you, and why?
• In your opinion did the Court's ruling provide an adequate safe guard against police misconduct?

In reviewing chapter 6,list and discussthe exceptions to the exclusionary rule createdby the Supreme Court in subsequent years. In your opinion, do these exceptions lessen the purpose of the Exclusionary Rule.

Fully explain the rationale for your position.