Question
Chapter11 solve this case for me please 4 The court's synopsis of the facts in this particular case certainly bears repeating. On September 14, 1907,
Chapter11
solve this case for me please
4 The court's synopsis of the facts in this particular case certainly bears repeating. "On September 14, 1907, the plaintiff was the owner of a thoroughbred Holstein-Friesian heifer, which was born on January 9, 1906, and had been thereafter duly christened 'Martha Pietertje Pauline.' The name is neither euphonious nor musical, but there is not much in aname anyway. Notwithstanding any handicap she may have had in the way of a cognomen, Martha Pietertje Pauline was a genuine 'highbrow,' having a pedigree as long and at least as well authenticated as that of the ordinary scion of effete European nobility who breaks into this land of democracy and equality, and offers his title to the highest bid- der at the matrimonial bargaining counter. The defendant was the owner of a bull about one year old, lowly born and nameless as far as the record discloses. This plebeian, having aspirations beyond his humble station in life, wandered beyond the confines of his own pastures, and sought the society of the adolescent and unsophisticated Martha, con- trary to the provisions of Sec. 1482, . . . As a result of this somewhat morganatic mesalliance, a calf was born July 5, 1908." What would a court consider in deciding whether Defendant should be held strictly liable for Plaintiff 's damages? Kopplin v. Quade, 130 N.W. 511 (Wis. 1911).
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started