Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Charles V. Webster Real Estate v. Rickard, 21 Cal. App. 3d 612, 98 Cal. Rptr. 559 (1971) In May 1967, Dr. Moore listed his 156-acre

Charles V. Webster Real Estate v. Rickard, 21 Cal. App. 3d 612, 98 Cal. Rptr. 559 (1971)

In May 1967, Dr. Moore listed his 156-acre vineyard with Watson Realty for $234,000. The exclusive right to sell agreement, which provided for a 5% commission, specified that the agency would terminate on December 31, 1968.

Dr. Moore later gave written consent to have the listing transferred from Watson Realty to Webster Real Estate. The list price was reduced to $187,200.

In June 1968, Dr. Moore died. Without any help from the real estate agents, the executor of Dr. Moores estate sold the vineyard in November for $152,000.

Believing they were entitled to their commission under the exclusive right to sell agreement, Webster Real Estate filed a claim against Dr. Moores estate for $7,600 (5% of the sale price). The executor rejected the claim, so Webster Real Estate sued the estate.

Was Webster Real Estate entitled to its commission?

Were they entitled to damages for breach of contract? Why or why not?

What if Webster Real Estate had been the procuring cause of the November sale?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Day Trading Strategies And Risk Management

Authors: Richard N. Williams

1st Edition

979-8863610528

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions