Chatham Automotive purchased new electric forklifts to move steel automobile parts two years ago. They cost $$$$85000$each$,$ including the charging stand. In$$ practice, it was found that they did not hold a charge as long as claimed by the$$ manufacturer, so operating costs are very high. As a$$ result, their current salvage value is about $$$$11000.$

Chatham is considering replacing them with propane models. New propane forklifts cost $$$$58000$ each. After one$$ year, they have a salvage value of $$$$40000,$ and thereafter decline in value at a$$ declining$-$balance depreciation rate of $20$percent$,$ as does the electric model from this time on$.$ The MARR is $9$ percent. Operating costs for the electric model will be $$$$19000$ this$$ year, rising by $13$ percent per year. Operating costs for the propane model will initially be $$$$11000$ over the first$$ year, rising by $13$ percent per year. Should Chatham Automotive replace the forklifts$$ now?

$($FILL IN THE BLANKS: Chatham automotive "should" or "should not" replace the forklifts now since the minimum total EAC for the electric forklifts is $"$$$\_\_\_\_\_\_"$ which is "higher" or "lower" than $"$$$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$"the minimum total EAC for the propane forklifts.

USE table of compound interest factors for discrete compounding periods when i$=9\%$

$($Round to the nearest dollar as$$ needed.$)$