Check My Work Fred entered into a written contract with Joe to purchase a car. The written contract was intended to be the final and complete agreement of the parties. Fred is unhappy with the performance of the car and has commenced an action for breach of contract based on an oral representation made at the time the written contract was executed. Fred may introduco evidence of the representation if it: a. Partially contradicts the written contract. b. Serves to clarify an ambiguous term in the written contract, c. Falls within the provision of the statute of frauds, d. Completely contradicts the written contract