Check the attached photo can you give me the relevant facts of the case?

(2)Could you see that s ection 1 5 of the Charter can be used here to appeal the case?

If yes explain what gives rise to the error of law for an appeal.If no help me in the right direction if you notice a different approach I thought section 15 would work. Without saying names. Use Mr. [first letter of name]

My main point was that I think education is a fundamental right that everyone should have access to. In this case, I found the issue to be an important piece of information. (skyp3 for questions). For SCC decision, one can argue that it limits people's access to education. As a consequence, it may lead to economic and social inequalities.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Denis v. Cote, 2019 SCC 44, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 482 APPEAL HEARD: May 16, 2019 JUDGMENT RENDERED: September 27, 2019 DOCKET: 38114 BETWEEN: Marie-Maude Denis Appellant and Marc-Yvan Cote Respondent - and - Her Majesty The Queen, Attorney General of Quebec, Federation professionnelle des journalistes du Quebec, Canadian Association of Journalists, Canadian Journalists for Freedom of Expression, Reporters Without Borders, La Presse (2018) Inc., Canadian Civil Liberties Association, AD IDEM/Canadian Media Lawyers Association, CTV, a Division of Bell Media Inc., Global News, a division of Corus Television Limited Partnership, The Globe and Mail Inc., Postmedia Network Inc. and Vice Studio Canada Inc. Interveners OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION: Reasons of Wagner C.J. Back to top CORAM: Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Gascon, Cote, Brown, Rowe and Martin JJ