Chevron case

Chevron creates a pretty high bar for overturning an agency's action or decision. But that bar is not impossible to overcome...

So my question is: are agencies always the "best" experts? In yourresponse, discuss what happens when you supplement another opinion for that of an agency. How do you stack them up against each other? If you do substitute another opinion for that of anagency, does that weaken the agency's trustworthiness or the public's confidence in their ability to do their job? Think about your own views during this past year regarding public health agencies like the CDC and COVID-19. What happens when we start to inject politics intoagency decision-making? Justify your response using the Chevron doctrine.