Chloe and Steve decide to solve a problem the following problem: They both have managerial positions at a tech company and their company is struggling to retain clients as new competition has emerged. They start by reviewing different strategies that help with client retention. It's a good thing that Steve has prior experience with this at a prior company, he takes the lead on this stage. After having generated as many strategies as they could, they evaluate the different strategies and pick one: lowering prices. This is not an example of effective analytical problem-solving because: 1.They should innovate to create new products that will attract more clients 2.Steve should not have taken the lead and both of them should have contributed equally 3.Lowering prices is not the best solution out there 4.They did not try to understand why the competition was able to attract new clients