City of Brighton v$.$ Rodriguez What is the legal issue in this case? What did the court decide?$2.$What is the distinction between $$employment$,$personal$,$ and $$neutral$$ risks? Why does the court say that this case involves the latter category?$3.$What is the $$but$-$for$$ or $$positional risk$$ test? How does the court apply it to the facts of this case? Would the outcome have been the same if the court had used a $$peculiar risk$$ test? An $$increased risk$$ test? An $$actual risk$$ test? $($See the text for explanations of these terms.$)$ Why or why not?$4.$Evaluate the judge$$s argument in the dissenting opin$-$ion. Is it persuasive? Why or why not?$5.$In your view, should employees be eligible for work$-$ers$$ compensation in cases of $$idiopathic$$ or unex$-$plained falls? Why or why not