Class. I am attaching some guidelines for your EAP draft proposal for week 3 to assist you.

1. Name of the fictional company (address, phone number, etc.)

2. Background company information

• This includes informing the facilitator of the nature of the company
• What does it do? (manufacturing, service, etc.) (This is a short narrative)
• How it does it? (General overview of how it makes its products or provides services.) (This is narrative)
• Identify departments, and number of employees, (additional pertinent company information needed to understand the company)
• Surrounding companies and environment (Explain what companies are in the surrounding areas. Short narrative explaining them.)

3. The purpose of this EAP proposal is for the facilitator to be able to understand fully the company while you are drafting your final EAP. You will get a response from the facilitator "yes this is fine," "please add more information," "or no this is inappropriate."

Formatting Writing and Organization Substance of EAP Elements and Emergency Student Responses to Drafts SSE 826 Emergency Response/Preparation Week 8 Final Draft EAP Directions: Your final draft EAP will be graded based on this rubric. Consequently, use this rubric as a guide when writing your EAP and check it again before you submit your EAP. Total points [100 points] 20 [10.00%] Students' EAP is organized in a manner that would allow an organization (theoretically) to use the plan as presented. There are very few to none proofreading and/ or writing errors. The plan is well organized and demonstrates thought to making the plan user friendly. Plan included all required elements in their entirety at: Cover page Introduction (i.e. critical anctions, hazards id) Element(s) (including headers) Appendices (where a. unroriate 150 [75.00%] The substance of nearly all elements satises the requirements / guidance given in the prior, draft rubrics or as detailed in announcements, mini- lectures, or other sources found in the course materials. Plan included all required elements in their entirety of: 2-3 detailed emergencies Pre, During and Post emergency information where applicable Use of applicable elements w/in each emergency 30 [15.00%] Student fully capitalized feedback given in prior drafts and delivered a nal EAP that demonstrates signicant improvements [relative to the amount of feedback given 10 [5.00%] Student's EAP was organized in a way that would allow it to be utilized by the chosen organization, but there W gaps that make some elements unclear. Student demonstrates some attention to proofreading and writing, but errors still remain. Plan included partial elements of: Cover page Introduction (i.e. critical functions, hazards id) Element(s) (including headers) Appendices (where appropriate) 75 [37.50%] The substance of the majority of the elements of the student's EAP satises requirements / guidance given in the prior, draft rubrics or as detailed in announcements, mini- lectures, or other sources found in the course materials. Plan included partial elements in their entirety q 0 2-3 detailed emergencies 0 Pre, During and Post emergency information where applicable Use of applicable elements w/ in each emergency 15 [7.50%] Student's submission demonstrates approximately 50% of the suggestions for improvements from prior drafts were implemented. 0 [0.00%] Student's EAP was poorly organized, demonstrated little to no detail to proofreading or writing. and the students plan was not organized. Plan did not include required elements of: Cover page Introduction (i.e. critical lnctions, hazards id) Element(s) (including headers) Appendices (where appropriate) 0 [0.00%] Various elements of the EAP do not demonstrate sufcient substance and detail as provided in prior, draft rubrics or as detailed in announcements, mini-lectures, or other sources found in the course materials. Plan did not include required elements at: . 2-3 detailed emergencies Pre, During and Post emergency information where applicable Use of applicable elements w/in each emer_ en 0 [0.00%] Student failed to apply feedback given in prior drafts