Companies invest in expansion projects with the expectation of increasing the earnings of its business Consider the case of Pheasant Pharmaceuticals: Pheasant Pharmaceuticals is considering an investment that will have the following sales, variable costs, and found operating costs Year 1 3,500 Year 4 4.250 $455 $38.50 Unit sales (units) Sales price Variable cost per unit Fored operating costs except depreciation Accelerated depreciation rate Year 2 4,000 $39.88 $22.85 $37,500 45% Year 3 4,200 $40.15 $23.67 $33.120 $22.34 $23.87 $39.560 $37,000 33% 15% This project will require an investment of $10.000 in new equipment. The equipment will have no salvage value at the end of the project's four year life. Pheasant Pharmaceuticals pays a constant tax rate of 40%, and it has a required rate of return of 11%. (Hint: Round each element in your computation- When using accelerated depreciation, the project's net present value (NPV) is_ including the project's net present value-to the nearest whole dollar) . (Hint: Again, round each element in your computation-including the When using straight-line depreciation, the project's NPV is project's net present value-to the nearest whole dollar.) Using the depreciation method will result in the greater NPV for the project. No other firm would take on this project if Pheasant Pharmaceuticals turns it down. How much should Pheasant Pharmaceuticals reduce the NPV of this project if it discovered that this project would reduce one of its division's net after-tax cash flows by $500 for each year of the four year project? $1.163 O $1,551 $931 $1,318 Pheasant Pharmaceuticals spent $2.250.00 on a marketing study to estimate the number of units that it can sell each year. What should Pheasant Pharmaceuticals do to take this information into account? O Increase the amount of the initial investment by $2.250.00 Increase the NPV of the project S2.250.00. The company does not need to do anything with the cost of the marketing study because the marketing study is a sunk coat