Company A is listing bonds on the Irish Regulated debt exchange. The client has listed bonds on the LSE in the UK$.$The financial statements were reviewed by PwC UK$.$ No additional transaction review is required.

True

False

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $2$ of $15.$

If the client is a new IFRS Global or Cluster Priority Client or becomes one in the year an out of country financial statement review is required.

True

False

Question $3$ of $15.$

An entity is likely to consider accounting policy information material if that information relates to material transactions, other events or conditions and relates to an area of significant judgements or assumptions in applying an accounting policy

True

False

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $4$ of $15.$

The objective of IFRS S$1$ is to require an entity to disclose information about its climate$-$related risks and opportunities that is useful to users of general purpose financial reports in making decisions relating to providing resources to the entity.

True

False

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $5$ of $15.$

XYZ LLC has recorded provisions for which there are also reimbursement rights. Management would like to offset the provision cost and the reimbursement income in the SOCI, and the engagement team has found that IAS $37$ allows for offsetting, is this permitted under IAS $1?$

No$,$ this must be gross, as IAS $1$ overrides all other standards in requiring gross presentation.

Yes, IAS $1$ specifically says that if another IFRS permits offsetting then this presentation is permissable.

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $6$ of $15.$

Steel Manfacturer Joint Stock Company, manufacturers steel and generates revenue from sale of steel. In its commercial registration it states that its primary activitiy is the sale of steel. However, it also routinely generates income from shipping its products to customers through shipping charges that are a separate performance obligation. The by shipping services are material and presented as other income on the face of the SOCI. The engagement team has challenged management on this presentation, however management has noted that due to the the commercial registration document it cannot present the shipping income as revenue. Is this appropriate under IAS $1$ and IFRS $15?$

Yes, it is appropriate to present the shipping sales as "other income" as the commercial registration document says that revenue is sale of steel products only.

It depends

No$,$ the sale of the shipping services is also a revenue generating activitiy and income is derived from sales to customers, therefore this is in the scope of IFRS $15$ and should be presented as revenue on the face of the SOCI.

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $7$ of $15.$

Client ABC plc presents its SOCI by function as per IAS $1.$ On the face of its Statement of Comprehensive income it also separately presents "Salaries". Is this clearly compliant with IAS $1?$

Yes, this is clearly compliant.

No$,$ entities should not generally mix nature and function

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $8$ of $15.$

Interest payable on loans and borrowings is the same as trade and payables and therefore can be presented in the same line item on the face of the SOFP?

True

False

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $9$ of $15.$

FGH Plc has an asset which was impaired during the year. The asset was used in the production of widgets however had a major breakdown and management decided to write off the remaining carrying value. In the past, depreciation in relation to this asset was recorded in cost of sales. In the December $2023$ financial statements, FGH Plc has presented the impairment below the operating profit line, as management believe the impairment is not operating in nature. Is this appropriate under the requirements of IAS $1?$

Yes, impairments are not operating in nature and therefore should be presented outside of operating profit.

Yes, impairments are non$-$cash so can be excluded from operating profit on that basis

No$,$ in this case the impairment relates to an asset that was being used in the operating activities and therefore the impairment should be presented within operating profit.

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $10$ of $15.$

Client ABC plc offsets material income and expenses, and presents the net of these on the face of the SOCI, is this permissible under IAS $1?$

Yes

No

Only where permitted by other IFRSs

Mark for follow up

$\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_$

Question $11$ of $15.$

In a long$-$term construction contract, the profit margins will be generally consistent from year to year irrespective of whether input or output method is used for estimating the stage of