Complete the analysis chart to include:

At least four options the decision maker could take and all the stakeholders you have identified from the case. Be sure to consider everyone who could be affected by the decision maker's actions.

Stakeholders are people or a business$/$entity that represents people. A stakeholder cannot be a thing such as a friendship or a reputation. Some stakeholders will be individuals, and others may be logically connected groups of people who would share an outcome. Please consider these groups carefully.

All options must be in the control of the central person $($decision maker$)$ named in the main ethical issue. For example, if the issue is Should Jack report, Jill? The first option could be $-$Jack could report Jill's stealing to the boss. There are probably many more than $4$ options but choose the $4$ best options. All options should be reasonable ones that the person named in the main ethical issue could choose to make their decision. For example, you could NOT use, Jill could turn herself into the boss because Jill is not the central person named in the main ethical issue. Also, choose the best options that could resolve the ethical issue.

Once you have four options and all the stakeholders filled in$,$ complete the chart with possible consequences; briefly explain how you believe each stakeholder may be affected by each option. For example, for the option $-$ Jack could report Jill, a possible consequence for Jack, as one of the stakeholders, is that Jack could become a victim of Jill's scorn. For Jill, as one of the stakeholders, a possible consequence is that Jill could lose her job.