Complete the following statements by filling in the blanks with either "moral" or "nonmoral" $($e$.$g$.,$ factual, scientific, legal$)$:

a$.$ Whether or not dumping should be permitted is a question.

b$.$ "Are dangerous products of any use in the third world?" is a question.

c$."$Is it proper for the U$.$S$.$ government to sponsor the export of dangerous products overseas?" is a question.

d$.$ Whether or not the notification system works as its supporters claim it works is a question.

e$."$Is it legal to dump this product overseas?" is a question.

Explain what dumping is$,$ giving some examples. Does dumping raise any moral issues? What are they? What would an ethical relativist say about dumping?

Speculate on why dumpers dump. Do you think they believe that what they are doing is morally permissible? How would you look at the situation if you were one of the manufacturers of Tris$-$impregnated pajamas?

If no law is broken, is there anything wrong with dumping? If so$,$ when is it wrong and why? Do any moral considerations support dumping products overseas when this violates U$.$S$.$ law?

What moral difference, if any, does it make who is dumping, why they are doing it$,$ where they are doing it$,$ or what the product is$?$

Critically assess the present notification system. Is it the right approach, or is it fundamentally flawed?

Putting aside the question of legality, what moral arguments can be given for and against dumping? What is your position on dumping, and what principles and values do you base it on$?$ Should we have laws prohibiting more types of dumping?