Compose an agreement to this post, scholarly response.

I have strong reservations about risking my own safety and freedom by getting involved in the George Floyd incident and potentially facing arrest. In such a scenario, I believe I would be more inclined to align myself with a peaceful protest rather than directly intervening in the ongoing investigation, particularly given the egregious and inhumane nature of Derek Chauvin's actions which clearly deviated from established police protocols. The fear of potential arrest and the chilling historical treatment of African Americans by law enforcement authorities, based on past instances, could inhibit my willingness to intervene in such a volatile situation. Being an African American woman, this fear is deeply ingrained in me, reflecting a broader apprehension of encountering trouble with the authorities despite acknowledging that not all police officers act inappropriately. Consequently, my reluctance to intervene in such situations is deeply rooted in a genuine concern for my own safety and well-being, stemming from a desire to err on the side of caution when it comes to interactions with law enforcement that may hold certain uncertainties and potential consequences. My wariness is not solely self-serving; rather, it reflects a broader awareness of the complexities involved in such encounters, particularly in cases where ambiguity and the fear of backlash loom large. Despite this caution, I wholeheartedly support the principles of accountability and justice in addressing heinous crimes, much like those perpetrated by individuals such as Derek Chauvin. These values underscore the necessity of us as a society to uphold standards of fairness and lawfulness, steering clear of any form of complicity or tolerance towards blatant injustices. Consequently, I firmly stand by my belief that refraining from direct intervention in a moment of uncertainty or peril does not warrant potential legal repercussions. My actions, or lack thereof, were not characterized by any criminal intent or interference with the ongoing investigative process, thus necessitating a measured and rational perspective when examining the circumstances in question.