Consider the counterworm in the example on that begins on page 483 (Chapter 22).

(i). Pretend you are a technical expert called as a witness in a lawsuit between the

sender of the counterworm and the target. What arguments could you make

for and against the sending of the worm?

(ii). How might the arguments for a company providing worms to fix security prob-

lems in their software differ from those for providing a counterworm? How

would they be the same?