Question
Consider the following three statements: I.The fact that the New York Times held in its possession for three months at least some of the material
Consider the following three statements:
I.The fact that the New York Times held in its possession for three months at least some of the material it now wants to publish cuts against its argument that no delay is warranted while a proper trial can be commenced at the district court level.
II.It is at least possible that the publication of some material by the New York Times in this case might actually harm American soldiers abroad.
III.The public is not entitled to know more about the conduct of war, or about foreign policy in general, than the Executive Branch thinks it proper for the public to know.
Which of the preceding statements is, or are, consistent with Justice Blackmun's dissent in New York Times v. U.S.?
Statements I and II only.
Statements I, II and III.
Statements II and III only.
Statement II only.
Statement I only.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started