Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Construct by defining the functions q and ti as required by item (ii) in Proposition 3.1. We can prove the result by showing that truth

Construct by defining the functions q and ti as required by item (ii) in Proposition

3.1. We can prove the result by showing that truth telling is a Bayesian equilibrium of

the game. Suppose it were not. If type ?i prefers to report that her type is ?

i , then the

same type ?i prefers to deviate from ?, and to play the strategy that ? prescribes for

?

i in . Hence ? is not a Bayesian equilibrium of . -

Proposition 3.1 shows that in the setup that we have described we can, without

loss of generality, restrict our attention to the case in which the seller chooses a di-

rect mechanism and proposes to agents that they report their types truthfully. Note,

however, that it is crucial to this construction that we have neglected problems of mul-

tiple equilibria by assuming that agents follow the seller's proposal provided that it is

an equilibrium and provided that it gives them expected utility of at least zero. This

is crucial because the equivalent direct mechanism that is constructed in the proof of

Proposition 3.1 might have Bayesian Nash equilibria other than truthtelling, and there

is no reason why these equilibria should be equivalent to any Bayesian Nash equilib-

rium of the indirect mechanism . Depending on how equilibria are selected, one or

the other mechanism might be strictly preferred by the seller in that case.

The revelation principle greatly simplifies our search for optimal mechanisms. We

can restrict our attention to direct mechanisms in which it is a Bayesian equilibrium

that everyone always reports their type truthfully and in which every type's expected

utility is at least zero. We want to define these properties of a direct mechanism

formally. For this we introduce additional notation.

We denote by ?-i the vector of all types except player i's type. We define

-i ? [ ?, ?]N-1. We denote by F-i the cumulative distribution of ?-i, and we denote

by f-i the density of F-i. Given a direct mechanism, we define for each agent i ? I a

function Q i : [ ?, ?] ? [0, 1] by setting

Q i(?i) = -

-i

qi(?i, ?-i)f-i(?-i) d?-i. (3.1)



image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

I only need help with parts 4 and 5. I got an EV of 335.5 for 2. A decision maker's risk tolerance is assessed at $1,210. Assume that this risk-averse individual's preferences can be modeled with an exponential utility function. 1) Compute the following utilities: U($1,000) U($800) U(SO) U(-$1,250) 2) Determine the expected utility for an investment with the following pay-off distribution: P($1,000) = 0.33 P($800) = 0.21 P(SO) = 0.33 P(-$1,250) = 0.13 3) Compute the exact certainty equivalent for the investment and associated risk premium. 4) Find the approximate certainty equivalent using the expected value and variance of above pay-off distribution. 5) Another investment possibility has an expected value of $2,400 and standard deviation of $300. Find the approximate certainty equivalent for this investment.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Intermediate Financial Management

Authors: Brigham, Daves

10th Edition

978-1439051764, 1111783659, 9780324594690, 1439051763, 9781111783655, 324594690, 978-1111021573

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

List seven ways to challenge an argument based on case law.

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

How do jalapeos produce a hot sensation?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

In what way is somatosensation several senses instead of one?

Answered: 1 week ago