Context : The coach of a high school volleyball team approaches you to get more information on the evaluation of his athletes. Next year several of his forwards graduate and he must make a selection camp to build a new team. He would like to be able to compare some physiological qualities between candidates that would be useful in the sport. With a quick search on the Internet, he realizes that there is a myriad of tests and asks you to evaluate his athletes using three of them (1. Margaria-Kalamen 2. Repetitive jump from Bosco 3. Wingate). Your research assistant tests the candidates and sends you the results (SEE EXCEL). The coach wants to make an informed choice based on the scientific literature to which he does not have access and therefore relies on you. He hires you to have a report composed of the following elements: Introduction : Summarize current knowledge and the reason for the tests . The value of these tests for the demands of sport The objective and hypothesis Discussion : What is measured in these tests? How is this measured/calculated? What are the peculiarities of each of the tests? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of the tests? How could he compare the results obtained between the candidates? What is the fatigue index and what does it mean? Is a lower value better? Depending on the results obtained, which candidate would be the most successful candidate? Explain. Which test would produce the highest level of lactatemia? Explain. What protocol or changes would you make to adapt the test to the situation? Explain. The coach also trains the school's racewalking team, would these tests be appropriate to do for their selection camp? Explain. Conclusion : If the coach were to choose only one test, which one would be the most appropriate for the situation? Why? Which athlete should he choose and report her results (compared to others). Note : This bulleted list serves to guide your writing, it is not exhaustive and should not translate into a question-and-answer writing style.\f\f