Could you answer a, b, and c

We discussed a paper in class that had some problems in how they analyzed and interpreted the data. The table below contains the amount of Cr(III) absorbed per gram of pelt (q, , units mg/g ) at each time measured ( t,min). It is hypothesized that this data can be fit with a pseudo-second-order rate model: qt=1+qek2tqe2k2t The authors of the paper claim there are 4 potential ways to linearize this equation 1) t/qt vs t 2) 1/qt vs 1/t 3) qt vs q/t 4) q/t vs qt a) Plot the data in excel for these 4 linearizations b) State the R2 value for the fit of each of these c) Which linearization is a better fit? Derive the linearized equation for that fit