Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Critical Legal Thinking Case: Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. v. Maddox Dwayne Maddox and his wife, Amanda, were driving home on a highway in their Nissan

image text in transcribed
Critical Legal Thinking Case: Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. v. Maddox Dwayne Maddox and his wife, Amanda, were driving home on a highway in their Nissan Pathnder SUV. Dwayne, who was driving the vehicle, weighed 170 pounds, and Amanda, who was sitting in the passenger seat, weighed 240 pounds. Amanda had previously had a gastric bypass surgery to help control her weight. Both were wearing their seat belts. Another driver, Edward Sapp, who was greatly intoxicated, drove his vehicle on the wrong side of the highway and collided headon with Maddoxes' SUV. Sapp died at the scene. Dwayne exited the SUV and suffered a shattered right heel. Amanda, however, was trapped inside the front passenger seat, and rescuers needed to extricate her from the vehicle with hydraulic equipment. Amanda was transported to a medical center. Amanda's seat belt did not properly protect her and her abdomen ruptured at the site of a prior gastric bypass surgery. Amanda's injuries were extensive. She suffered fractures of her sternum, several ribs, vertebrae, and hip. Amanda was hospitalized for 139 days, had 75 surgical procedures, was unable to eat food for seven months, and was medically required to keep an open abdominal woundwith her internal organs visibleduring part of the time she was hospitalized. Amanda sued Nissan Motor Company, Ltd., the company that manufactured the Nissan Pathnder SUV that she and her husband were in at the time of the accident, to recover damages for strict liability based on an alleged defect in design of the seat belt restraint system of the SUV. Amanda alleged that Nissan designed its seat belt restraint system to protect persons weighing approximately 171 ' pounds, that the restraint system was not properly designed to protect a person of her weight, and that Nissan should be found strictly liable for a design defect for not designing its seat belt restraint system to safely protect persons of her weight. r_-__ ls Nissan strictly liable for failing to design a seat belt restraint system to safely * protect heavier persons in vehicle collisions

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law Cases And Materials

Authors: Jonathan Varat, Vikram Amar, Evan Caminker

16th Edition

1647083613, 978-1647083618

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions