critically evaluate the following statement: Currently, higher education is too difficult to access and pass in South Africa. All admission requirements should be removed for all higher education qualifications, and the pass mark should be lowered to 30% in all higher education modules. With the above in mind, you need to decide what position you will adopt on this topic - and on the provided statement itself. Do you agree with the statement? Why? Do you disagree? Why? Do you agree and/or disagree with certain parts of the statement? Which parts, and why? Some examples of positions that you may want to adopt or combine, include (but are certainly not limited to): i. Higher education is not too difficult to access and pass in South Africa because of a, b and c, and so nothing needs to change because of x, y, and z. ii. All admission requirements should be removed for all qualifications because of a, b and c - but the pass mark should remain 50% in all modules because of x, y, and z. iii. All admission requirements should stay the same for all qualifications because of a, b and c - but the pass mark should be lowered to 30% in all modules because of x, y, and z. iv. Some admissions requirements for higher education need to remain because of a, b and c, and some should change because of x, y and z. v. The pass mark in some modules should remain at 50% because of a, b and c, but should change to 30% in other modules because of x, y and z. vi. Other factors - such as a, b, c, x, y and z - should determine who can be admitted into qualifications and/or what students need to achieve to pass modules