Danzer is an employee of Carter, who owns a furniture store. Pennell, who operates an equipment rental business, has good personal and business relations with Carter. Carter's furniture store attracts as customers people who are moving or remodeling, and Carter frequently refers them to Pennell's rental business. Danzer contacted Pennell during business hours and asked for the free use of carpet cleaning equipment for a few weeks. Pennell was under the erroneous impression that Carter wanted the equipment to clean carpets in the furniture store and had instructed dancer to call. Pennell granted the request as a return favor to Carter. In fact, Carter was not involved in the request. Danzer, acting independently, wanted the cleaning equipment to operate a personal business during the pre-holiday season. Danzer cleaned carpets for private homeowners during evening hours at a rate slightly less than that of professional cleaners. Pennell later discovered these facts and further learned that Danzer earned $500 cleaning carpets. The fair rental value of the equipment is $200.Is restitution appropriate?If so how should it be measured