Dave is charged with robbing a bank. During Dave's trial in California Superior Court, the prosecution calls Dave's wife, Wilma, to the stand. Wilma testified, over Dave's objection, (1) that she saw Dave commit the robbery. The prosecution then asks Wilma, over Dave's objection, (2) whether Dave told her: "I committed the bank robbery." How should the court rule on Dave's two objections? Group of answer choices The court should sustain the objection to statement (1) but overrule the objection to statement (2). The court should overrule both objections. The court should overrule the objection to statement (1) but sustain the objection to statement (2). The court should sustain both objections