David Glasner argues in his essay,"An Evolutionary Theory of the State Monopoly over Money': "Since there seems to be no technical reason inherent in the nature of the medium of exchange that would have necessitated a monopoly over money, the "defense sovereignty" explanation I have proposed here seems to be a more plausible explanation for the monopoly than any yet proposed." What does "defense-sovereignty" explanation of the state's monopoly over money mean? O A. Money arose because of political policies that increased economic efficiency. O B. A state typically attains a monopoly over money because it is an attractive source of revenue. O C. The sovereign established a monopoly over money in order to support economic growth. O D. Money can only be created by the state because the value of money can only be preserved by a monopoly over its production. O E. Indirect exchange cannot occur without coins, when there are no legal ways to prohibit private counterfeiters