Dear expert tutor,

I have received this task yesterday and i spent lot of time with it because i am not quite sure with my understanding for the question itself. As i am an overseas student the understanding of the law case might be really hard and i have tried my best for, and i really need a help from expert tutor to help me with the task. Could you help me figured it out?

In advanced, i am really appreciated for your help, Thank you

Mr Lee is an accountant. During his lunch break he was walking along Queen Street on his way to meet his friend, Mrs Smith. A tennis ball hit Mr Lee's face, causing his glasses to break and deeply cut the area between his left eye and nose. He was taken to hospital and later, had to have special surgery on his face to mend the cut without scarring. Investigations found that the tennis ball came from a roof top tennis court owned, controlled and managed by City Hotel, which is located on the comer of Queen and Castle Streets. Two guests had been playing tennis and one hit the ball over the ve-metre fence that surrounded the court. There had been many reports made to the City Hotel of tennis balls being hit outside the tennis court. Mr Lee claims that the tennis court should have been enclosed with a net which is relatively cheap and easy to install. Mr Lee claims that City Hotel was negligent in allowing the accident to occur. Discuss Mr Lee's case in terms of all the elements he needs to establish to be successful in a negligence action against City Hotel. In your answer, you must consider and apply any relevant statutog provisions and decisions from any relevant cases you have studied. Structure n Using the IPAC method to solve a legal problem Identify the relevant legal issue/s. Explain the relevant legal principles. Identify the legislation provisions associated with the relevant legal principles. Identify the case law associated with the relevant legal principles. Explain what the legal principles mean to the given facts. Explain the effect of legal principles have on the rights and obligations of the sarties. Consider the merits of one party's case and also consider the arguments of the other side. Arrive at a conclusion with legal reasoning. Present answer using the IPAC method accurately to make distinct and logical legal arguments. Organise materials into a coherent structure, including appropriate paragraphs, accurate spelling, clear sentence construction and punctuation