Question
Descartes thought that animals were flesh and blood machines that operated purely on instinct and did not have a soul. But he advocated for animal
Descartes thought that animals were "flesh and blood machines" that operated purely on instinct and did not have a soul. But he advocated for animal research to better understand human physiology. Beach argued that the study of animal behavior was a valid way to understand human behavior. Are there sufficient similarities between human and animal behavior to warrant the study of comparative psychology? Descartes thought that animal research was valid. Why did he think that if he thought animals functioned solely on instinct? In the assigned article by Beach, he reviews historical perspectives on instinct. What was the position of Beach on instinct and the value of studying behavior in non-human animals?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started