Description

This case is intended to illustrate the problems that can arise in a competitive work environment in which a matrix structure is used to complete projects. M&M, like most accounting firms, had a tiered promotion system. New CPAs entered as junior or staff accountants. Within two years, their performance was reviewed, and they were either asked to leave or promoted to senior accountant. Successful implementation of projects means reaching the goals of the organization and with the help of the right team, structure and culture.

Materials Required

Refer to:

Larson & Gray, Chapter 3, Case 3.1: Moss and McAdams Accounting Firm: Questions 1-4

Detailed Instructions

Read the Case Study associated with the specific unit carefully, then proceed as follows:

1. Prepare a response that is 750 words or maximum of 3 pages double-spaced (excluding title page and reference page). You should follow APA format and referencing style.
2. While there is no "formula" for analyzing case studies, the following guidelines are recommended:
   1. Define the outcomes and objectives for your analysis. What questions are you trying to answer and what issues are you trying to resolve?
   2. Skim through the case study and get a sense for how it has been structured.
   3. ead through the case study with paper and pencil and make notes as you go along.
   4. Make sure to include a comprehensive introduction and conclusion to your report.

Prepare your report as an essay, summarizing the responses to the questions below.

1. If you were Palmer at the end of the case, how would you respond?
2. What, if anything, could Palmer have done to avoid losing Olds?
3. What advantages and disadvantages of a matrix type organization are apparent from this case?
4. What could the management at M&M do to manage situations more effectively like this?