Details: Scenario: You are the hospital administrator and are told by your ICU unit director of a patient in the unit that has suffered serious brain damage, but is not currently meeting the criteria for complete brain death. Half of the family is insisting that the patient "wouldn't want to live this way" and the other half is accusing them of wanting to kill the patient. Some allegations have been raised about a substantial inheritance for some family members upon the patient's death. The battle is becoming intense and it is beginning to disrupt the medical and nursing staff. 1) Write an analysis (1,250-1,500 words) of the situation from an ethical and legal perspective. Address the following questions: a) What are the ethical issues? b) What are the legal issues? c) What are the medical care issues? d) What actions would you take? Why? How? e) What resources would you tap? 2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Apply Rubrics Brain Death Scenario 1 2 3 Unsatisfact Less Than Satisfactory ory Satisfactory 79.00% 0.00% 74.00% 4 Good 87.00% 5 Excellent 100.00% 70.0 %Content Demonstrate Demonstrates Demonstrate Demonstrates 40.0 %Read Does not demonstrate s only knowledge of s acceptable thorough the the concepts in knowledge of knowledge of scenario on understandin minimal g of the understandin the brain-death the concepts the concepts possible scenario, in the brain- in the brainbrain death concepts in g of the concepts in including the death death and identifythe brainthe brainissues and scenario, scenario, the ethical, death death implications, including the including the legal, and scenario, including the scenario, but has some issues and issues and medical including the slight implications implications. care issues, issues and misunderstandi (in your own Clearly along with implications. issues and implications. ng of the words). answers the the actions Does not Demonstrate implications. Develops an questions and s only Provides a acceptable develops a minimal basic idea of response to very strong abilities for critical the questions rationale. critical thinking and and rationale Introduces thinking and analysis for the for them. appropriate analysis, and questions, Utilizes some examples. develops answers, and examples. weak rationale. Does answers to not include the examples or questions, descriptions. with minimal rationale Does not use Provides Supports main Supports Supports 30.0 points with main points main points %Integrate references, some examples, or supporting examples and with with s explanations, references, references, information explanations. examples, but minimal but fails to explanations, examples, from explanations include and and full outside and no published examples. explanations resources published references to Analysis and of how they into the references. support claims description isapply. body of and ideas. direct, Thoughtfully, paper. competent, analyzes, and evaluates, appropriate and describes of the major points criteria. of the criteria. 20.0 %Organizat ion and Effectivene ss Paper lacks Thesis Thesis and/or Thesis and/or Thesis and/or 7.0 and/or main main claim are main claim main claim %Assignme any discernible claim are apparent and are clear and are nt insufficiently appropriate to forecast the comprehensiv Developme overall purpose or developed purpose. development e. The nt and organizing and/or of the paper. essence of Purpose claim. vague; It is the paper is purpose is descriptive contained not clear. and within the reflective of thesis. Thesis the statement arguments makes the and purpose of appropriate the paper to the clear. purpose. Statement of Sufficient Argument is Argument Clear and 8.0 justification orderly, but shows logical convincing %Argument purpose is Logic and not justified of claims is may have a few progression. argument lacking. inconsistencies Techniques presents a Constructio by the conclusion. Argument . The argument of persuasive n The lacks presents argumentatioclaim in a conclusion consistent minimal n are distinctive does not unity. There justification of evident. and support the are obvious claims. There is a compelling claim made. flaws in the Argument smooth manner. All you would take, the rationales you would utilize, and the resources you would access. demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the material and does not develop effective answers to the questions, with rationale. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. logic. Some logically, but progression sources are sources have not thoroughly, of claims authoritative. questionable supports the from credibility. purpose. introduction Sources used to are credible. conclusion. Introduction Most sources and conclusion are bracket the authoritative. thesis. Surface Frequent Some Prose is Writer is 5.0 and mechanical largely free clearly in %Mechanic errors are repetitive errors or typos of command of s of Writing pervasive enough that mechanical are present, mechanical standard, (includes they impede errors but are not errors, written, spelling, although a academic punctuatio communicati distract the overly on of reader. distracting to few may be English. n, Inconsistenci the reader. present. A grammar, meaning. Inappropriat es in Correct variety of language e word language sentence sentence use) choice and/or choice structure and structures sentence (register), audienceand effective construction sentence appropriate figures of are used. structure, language are speech are and/or word used. used. choice are present. 10.0 %Format Appropriate All format 5.0 %Paper Template is Appropriate Appropriate not used template is template is template is elements are Format appropriately used, but used. fully used. correct. (Use of some Formatting is There are appropriate , or documentati elements are correct, virtually no style for although some errors in the major on format is missing or rarely mistaken. A minor errors formatting and lack of may be style. assignment followed correctly. control with present. ) formatting is apparent. No reference Reference Reference Reference In-text 5.0 page is page is page is citations and %Research page is included. No present. included and present and a reference Citations citations are Citations are lists sources fully page are (In-text used. inconsistentl used in the inclusive of complete and citations y used. paper. Sources all cited correct. The for are sources. documentatio paraphrasi appropriately Documentati n of cited ng and documented, on is sources is direct although some appropriate free of error. quotes, and errors may be and citation reference present style is page listing usually and correct. formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 100 %Total Weightage